Skip to content

Conversation

Young-Flash
Copy link
Member

close #118469

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 1, 2023

r? @b-naber

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 1, 2023
@Young-Flash
Copy link
Member Author

seems b-naber has not time to review this, let's try @rustbot r?

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 6, 2023

Error: Parsing assign command in comment failed: ...'' | error: specify user to assign to at >| ''...

Please file an issue on GitHub at triagebot if there's a problem with this bot, or reach out on #t-infra on Zulip.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 6, 2023

Error: Parsing assign command in comment failed: ...'' | error: specify user to assign to at >| ''...

Please file an issue on GitHub at triagebot if there's a problem with this bot, or reach out on #t-infra on Zulip.

@Young-Flash
Copy link
Member Author

could @saethlin help review this?

@saethlin
Copy link
Member

saethlin commented Dec 6, 2023

Did you pick me because you saw my name on the issue? I really don't know much of anything about this part of the compiler, so I wouldn't have picked me.

@Young-Flash
Copy link
Member Author

Did you pick me because you saw my name on the issue?

Oh yeah.

I really don't know much of anything about this part of the compiler, so I wouldn't have picked me.

Sorry for the interruption.

@saethlin
Copy link
Member

saethlin commented Dec 7, 2023

No need to apologize. A lot of the compiler team tends to go on vacation around this time, and some of the contributors group (which I'm in) does get review requests.

r? compiler

@rustbot rustbot assigned compiler-errors and unassigned b-naber Dec 7, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 8, 2023

📌 Commit e4cfe03 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 8, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117586 (Uplift the (new solver) canonicalizer into `rustc_next_trait_solver`)
 - rust-lang#118502 (fix: correct the arg for 'suggest to use associated function syntax' diagnostic)
 - rust-lang#118694 (Add instance evaluation and methods to read an allocation in StableMIR)
 - rust-lang#118715 (privacy: visit trait def id of projections)
 - rust-lang#118730 (recurse into refs when comparing tys for diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#118736 (temporarily revert "ice on ambguity in mir typeck")

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9041d1c into rust-lang:master Dec 9, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Dec 9, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118502 - Young-Flash:fix, r=compiler-errors

fix: correct the arg for 'suggest to use associated function syntax' diagnostic

close rust-lang#118469
@Young-Flash Young-Flash deleted the fix branch December 9, 2023 09:46
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2023
chore: add test case for type with generic

follow up rust-lang#118502
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118775 - Young-Flash:fix, r=compiler-errors

chore: add test case for type with generic

follow up rust-lang#118502
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2023
fix: correct the args for `disambiguate the associated function` diagnostic

This is somehow silimar to rust-lang#118502, we shouldn't take receiver as first arg all the cases.

close rust-lang#118819
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2023
fix: correct the args for `disambiguate the associated function` diagnostic

This is somehow silimar to rust-lang/rust#118502, we shouldn't take receiver as first arg all the cases.

close rust-lang/rust#118819
Nadrieril added a commit to Nadrieril/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
fix: correct suggestion arg for impl trait

follow up rust-lang#118502, close rust-lang#119775
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
fix: correct suggestion arg for impl trait

follow up rust-lang#118502, close rust-lang#119775
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#119957 - Young-Flash:fix, r=fmease

fix: correct suggestion arg for impl trait

follow up rust-lang#118502, close rust-lang#119775
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2024
fix: correct the args for `disambiguate the associated function` diagnostic

This is somehow silimar to rust-lang/rust#118502, we shouldn't take receiver as first arg all the cases.

close rust-lang/rust#118819
RalfJung pushed a commit to RalfJung/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2024
fix: correct the args for `disambiguate the associated function` diagnostic

This is somehow silimar to rust-lang/rust#118502, we shouldn't take receiver as first arg all the cases.

close rust-lang/rust#118819
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

suggest to use associated function syntax diagnostic take receiver as first arg mistakely
6 participants